by blondy28 Sat Oct 02, 2021 4:35 pm
SoxIlliniRob wrote: alohafri wrote:"We obviously didn’t envision having Republicans as part of our party," Rep. Ilhan Omar said of two centrist Democrat senators, Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema.
Same as Greene and Bobart calling people like Cheney, Kinzinger, and Romney RINO.
My issue with Manchin and Sinema isn't that they have a contrarian position. It's that they are taking meetings with and political donations from groups and corporations who strongly oppose the pending legislation. We don't have a "for the people" government anymore as far as I'm concerned. It's now a "For the rich people" government. Just yesterday, Sinema had fund raising meetings with 4 different groups who oppose the legislation, and all gave her large donations. Basically, we're selling political positions to bidders. It's fucking insanity that such a system is alive and running in our country. I don't care if the positions they are selling are liberal or conservative. It's the brazen way they are doing it in the wide open that bother me.
In the end, at least Manchin sees it as a negotiation and a push and pull. Sinema seems like she might just be a curmudgeon who gets more out of just being a contrarian than someone who is a serious legislator. They can't even get her to state her position on the pending bill. They can't get her to commit to a $$ amount for the pending bill. She's just playing coy. I suspect that's because she's not done selling her positions on these matters and so she's afraid to commit until all of the money has come off the table. I can't imagine she won't be primaried by her own party, whether that turns out well or badly for Dems.
Exactly. That's definitely a "both sides" false equivalency to compare the two. The dems have always had one or two politicians more to the center, even right on certain issues. Joe Lieberman. Mary Landrieu. Your anlysis on Sinema, particularly, is spot on. It's more appropriate to compare Sinema to MTG...neither who are doing anything they were elected to do. Manchin's full of shit...in the pocket of the coal industry, but more likely, padding his daughter's bank account...but he actually pretends to negotiate. I'm baffled by his comment about taking an approach of rewarding rather than entitlement. How does one reward someone with universal pre-K or child care? If you fund child care, doesn't the single mom or low income family have greater opportunity to maximize income? You don't have to get multiple part-time jobs to work around your kids' school hours and vacation schedules. You can actually get a good job...higher paying. Doesn't that save us, the tax payers, on the back end because this family is not as reliant (or at all reliant) on SNAP and other government programs? Doesn't universal pre-K give kids a head start in school, increasing their likelihood of academic success, which might translate into professional success, thus not perpetuating the cycle? And Manchin, with the "what are the pay-fors". Sure...they say that, but giving a few billion to the IRS so they could add personnel to go after tax cheats, recovering trillions is a "nonstarter". Even though WV voted for Trump in huge numbers, both of these bills are very popular among the WV voters, and they would be one of the states that would benefit most by them.