Home4 posters
Woodward interview with Hugh Hewitt
joepoe- Not a Fanboy
- Posts : 30
Join date : 2017-05-05
SoxIlliniRob- Bova!
- Posts : 1942
Join date : 2017-05-05
Age : 58
Location : Saint Charles, IL
Maybe Mueller will find the same, or maybe Mueller has more info at his disposal. I doubt Woodward was able to subpoena people like Kushner or Cohen or Manafort and get sworn testimony from them the way Mueller currently is. If there's collusion, Mueller will likely find it. If not, he won't. Whether there is or isn't, Trump sure seems hellbent on stopping them from looking and on preventing the investigation from moving forward....not to mention constantly obstructing justice.
blondy28- Bova!
- Posts : 1804
Join date : 2017-05-06
SoxIlliniRob wrote:Maybe Mueller will find the same, or maybe Mueller has more info at his disposal. I doubt Woodward was able to subpoena people like Kushner or Cohen or Manafort and get sworn testimony from them the way Mueller currently is. If there's collusion, Mueller will likely find it. If not, he won't. Whether there is or isn't, Trump sure seems hellbent on stopping them from looking and on preventing the investigation from moving forward....not to mention constantly obstructing justice.
Maybe?
The thing is, the question is flawed, as Malcolm Nance always points out. It's not collusion. It's conspiracy and/or treason. And, as you say, probably obstruction of justice. There are probably crimes associated with his company as well. Unnamed co-conspirator.
sharpy- Fanboy
- Posts : 915
Join date : 2017-05-10
blondy28 wrote:SoxIlliniRob wrote:Maybe Mueller will find the same, or maybe Mueller has more info at his disposal. I doubt Woodward was able to subpoena people like Kushner or Cohen or Manafort and get sworn testimony from them the way Mueller currently is. If there's collusion, Mueller will likely find it. If not, he won't. Whether there is or isn't, Trump sure seems hellbent on stopping them from looking and on preventing the investigation from moving forward....not to mention constantly obstructing justice.
Maybe?
The thing is, the question is flawed, as Malcolm Nance always points out. It's not collusion. It's conspiracy and/or treason. And, as you say, probably obstruction of justice. There are probably crimes associated with his company as well. Unnamed co-conspirator.
*sigh* What is collusion? If you mean Trump planned for Russia to hack the democratic emails and other anti-Clinton information and give it to him, no, he didn't do that, b/c he's too fucking stupid to do plan that. How about him being a money launderer for the Russian mob and for Putin with his hotels and casinos? How bout the loans he received from the Russian banks b/c he could no longer get loans to build an out-house from US banks? Is that "collusion"? Or is that having you by the short hairs? And what's worse? Having the democrats up your ass? or the MOB? *sigh*
Similar topics
|
|
|