Fanboy Central

For the Fanboys of the White Sox


    Woodward interview with Hugh Hewitt

    Share
    avatar
    joepoe
    Not a Fanboy

    Posts : 17
    Join date : 2017-05-05

    Woodward interview with Hugh Hewitt

    Post by joepoe on Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:02 am

    avatar
    SoxIlliniRob
    Fanboy

    Posts : 1041
    Join date : 2017-05-05
    Age : 52
    Location : Saint Charles, IL

    Re: Woodward interview with Hugh Hewitt

    Post by SoxIlliniRob on Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:32 am

    Maybe Mueller will find the same, or maybe Mueller has more info at his disposal.  I doubt Woodward was able to subpoena people like Kushner or Cohen or Manafort and get sworn testimony from them the way Mueller currently is.  If there's collusion, Mueller will likely find it.  If not, he won't.  Whether there is or isn't, Trump sure seems hellbent on stopping them from looking and on preventing the investigation from moving forward....not to mention constantly obstructing justice.
    avatar
    blondy28
    Fanboy

    Posts : 834
    Join date : 2017-05-06

    Re: Woodward interview with Hugh Hewitt

    Post by blondy28 on Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:38 pm

    SoxIlliniRob wrote:Maybe Mueller will find the same, or maybe Mueller has more info at his disposal.  I doubt Woodward was able to subpoena people like Kushner or Cohen or Manafort and get sworn testimony from them the way Mueller currently is.  If there's collusion, Mueller will likely find it.  If not, he won't.  Whether there is or isn't, Trump sure seems hellbent on stopping them from looking and on preventing the investigation from moving forward....not to mention constantly obstructing justice.

    Maybe?  

    The thing is, the question is flawed, as Malcolm Nance always points out.  It's not collusion.  It's conspiracy and/or treason.  And, as you say, probably obstruction of justice.  There are probably crimes associated with his company as well.  Unnamed co-conspirator.
    avatar
    sharpy
    Getting to be a Fanboy

    Posts : 463
    Join date : 2017-05-10

    Re: Woodward interview with Hugh Hewitt

    Post by sharpy on Sat Sep 22, 2018 7:11 pm

    blondy28 wrote:
    SoxIlliniRob wrote:Maybe Mueller will find the same, or maybe Mueller has more info at his disposal.  I doubt Woodward was able to subpoena people like Kushner or Cohen or Manafort and get sworn testimony from them the way Mueller currently is.  If there's collusion, Mueller will likely find it.  If not, he won't.  Whether there is or isn't, Trump sure seems hellbent on stopping them from looking and on preventing the investigation from moving forward....not to mention constantly obstructing justice.

    Maybe?  

    The thing is, the question is flawed, as Malcolm Nance always points out.  It's not collusion.  It's conspiracy and/or treason.  And, as you say, probably obstruction of justice.  There are probably crimes associated with his company as well.  Unnamed co-conspirator.


    *sigh* What is collusion?  If you mean Trump planned for Russia to hack the democratic emails and other anti-Clinton information and give it to him, no, he didn't do that, b/c he's too fucking stupid to do plan that. How about him being a money launderer for the Russian mob and for Putin with his hotels and casinos? How bout the loans he received from the Russian banks b/c he could no longer get loans to build an out-house from US banks? Is that "collusion"?  Or is that having you by the short hairs?  And what's worse? Having the democrats up your ass? or the MOB? *sigh*  

    Sponsored content

    Re: Woodward interview with Hugh Hewitt

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:02 pm